Recent research into land reform projects in the Western Cape sought to establish the differences between successful and unsuccessful projects.…
It is a proven fact that the Western Cape has produced more successful land reform projects, 62%, than any other province in South Africa. However, this cannot obscure the fact that the remainder of these projects, well over a third, have failed. Research was conducted to establish the reason for both the successes and failures, and the lessons that could be drawn from both scenarios in order to make land reform a success in South Africa.
When the Western Cape Department of Agriculture conducted a performance evaluation of agricultural land reform projects, it evaluated a sample of 135 out of 246 projects. These projects were supported by the provincial department from 1 April 2009 to March 2013 within the policy framework formulated by the national Department of Rural Development and Land Reform (DRDLR).
Three dimensions were taken into account: economic, environmental and socio-economic, according to Mogale Sebopetsa, acting chief director: Farmer Support and Development of the Western Cape Department of Agriculture. These were in line with the “PPP” definition of a sustainable farming operation – a profitable enterprise that looks after its people and minimises the impact of its operations on the planet.
To evaluate each dimension, the department developed an index with indicators and a possible maximum score for each.
Rating the economic dimension, it was taken into account whether a project:
Five indicators were used to rate the environmental dimension:
This dimension was rated according to empowerment targets, labour legislation, household income and quality of life of the project’s beneficiaries, as well as general indicators pertaining to the beneficiaries and the workforce. These included the level of internal conflict and share of inactive beneficiaries.
According to Sebopetsa, the following percentages indicated the relative success of the evaluated projects:
The reviewed projects generally fared better on the economic criteria, while lagging behind on the other two dimensions. In the case of failed projects, it was apparent that the following were problem areas:
In addition, beneficiaries in failed projects:
The success story
In South Africa’s agricultural sector today, it is rare to hear of a farming enterprise that increases its labour force, let alone one that wants to build new houses for its workers. Yet this is exactly what the Bosman family, who farm near Wellington in the Boland, have done.
The family made the decision to embark on a land reform project in 2008 and have since increased their workforce from 260 to 420 people, 300 of whom are permanently employed on the family’s 10 farms. The Bosmans also have 122 staff houses on their farms and are developing a housing project in Wellington for their retired and younger workers.
The family and their workers decided on an equity scheme model for their land reform project.
The following puts the story into perspective:
The failed project
Approximately 30km away from Lelienfontein lies the farm Bellevue, in Agter-Paarl. This, unfortunately, is one of the Western Cape’s failed land reform projects. One of the project’s beneficiaries, Ivan Cloete, used to trade in cut flowers but for seven years, established himself as a full-time pig producer as part of the Penhill Small Farmers’ Co-op in Blackheath, Cape Town.
“I produced pork of outstanding quality,” he recalls. “In fact, an export abattoir in Winelands Park, Stikland, used to buy my pigs. My unit consisted of 42 sows, which enabled me to produce 600 pigs in two cycles per year.” In 2009, Cloete was named as Winning Entrepreneur with the Potential for Outstanding Achievement in a Western Cape competition, organised by the Western Cape Government and other stakeholders.
As an aspiring commercial farmer, he had been on the national DRDLR’s data base for about seven years before he was finally informed in November 2012 that the farm Bellevue was available. He was also informed, however, that there was another beneficiary, Theophelus Sibeko, with whom he had to share the farm.
Although Cloete and Sibeko had never met, they moved to the 96ha poultry farm, which had two dwellings, wine grape vineyards on 9,5ha and olive groves with approximately 800 trees. According to Cloete, the farm, which the DRDLR had bought a year earlier, was neglected. He alleges that the department said he had to stop farming pigs and become a poultry farmer instead.
From correspondence between the DRDLR and Cloete, it appears that his relationship with Sibeko deteriorated to an irreparable state. The department indicated that it was looking into the possibility of obtaining another farm for Cloete. Although sometimes despondent, he has not lost heart and is a firm believer in perseverance. “Although Sibeko has not been farming at all since our arrival, we subdivided our property informally,” he explains.
“Currently, I’ve got 46 pigs on the farm, but I can only afford to feed them waste potato chips that I obtain from a factory. As a result, I can only sell them to the informal market.”
He says an officer of the DRDLR visits them occasionally, but the department has not provided them with any equipment. In fact, their electricity supply was cut off and the bill was in arrears even before they occupied the farm.
He adds that the Western Cape Department of Agriculture has so far provided him twice with food security packages (including 10 sows of a good breeding quality, pork feed and medicine). The province’s recently appointed minister of agriculture,
Alan Winde, visited to encourage him, and to learn more about why the Bellevue project had failed. Cloete currently fertilises the olive trees with pork manure, and irrigates them and one of the vineyard blocks under gravitation from a reservoir, with the help of a neighbour. He has obtained a market for the next grape and olive harvests.
According to Cloete, government’s land reform policy raises expectations, something that Andreas confirms. In contrast to the Bellevue project, these expectations were fulfilled for the beneficiaries of the Bosman Adama project. Even in their first year, the Bosmans paid out a dividend to the beneficiaries. “Because of high expectations, one has to budget,” Bosman says.
Andreas’s family has been working for five generations on farms belonging to the Bosman family and they regard their land reform project as an ongoing partnership that offers opportunities to improve quality of life. But trust, ongoing communication and joint decision-making based on sound information about the financial state of their farming enterprise are key components for success.
Phone Ivan Cloete on 082 472 6282 and Petrus Bosman on 021 873 2517.
Farming is not for the faint-hearted. In addition to adverse climatic conditions, farmers have to cope with rising costs and…
Wool growers in Lesotho, who had not received an income since March 2018, are now selling their stock to slaughter…