In this second part of our series on managing grasslands for biodiversity, grassland ecologist Dr Richard Lechmere-Oertel discusses guidelines and…
Grassland changes because of grazing and burning pressure. Environmental and management regimes can cause a shift in plant and animal species composition, thus altering the grassland. The biological architecture and function, soil structure and
fertility, water provision, nutrient cycling and fodder flow are all affected.
In terms of human livelihood or biodiversity, such changes are often seen as ‘degradation’, or a negative shift relative to the original state of the system or a management objective. Change can be seen by measureable indicators (see Table 1). Grassland ecologists see change progressing in a series of step-like stages, with observable movement in species composition, structure and function.
There is no single biodiversity-friendly best-practice that applies equally to burning and grazing all grasslands. Ecosystems, with varying biodiversity components, respond differently to different grazing and burning treatments. Thus, the focus is on
principles of burning and grazing that can be adapted to the condition of a specific grassland to meet specific objectives.
Burning for biodiversity
As farmers know, fire is complex. Differences in fuel load and moisture content, season, type of burn (head burn or back
burn), and prevailing weather (time-since-rain, wind, temperature, and relative humidity) will give different (intentional or unintentional) results. These variables influence the heat of the fire, the height of the flames and the duration of exposure.
Incorrectly applying or excluding fire can have undesirable results such as bush encroachment, soil loss, shifts in species
composition and so on.
The decision on when and how to burn grassland should be based on:
Grazing for biodiversity
Grazing is the most important management factor influencing grasslands. Many grassland species can sustain grazing pressure, and grazing seems to maintain the ecological character of grassland ecosystems, particularly the more arid ones.
However, most grasslands are not adapted to the sustained high grazing pressure typical of many livestock operations
with little management variety (fire frequency and type, grazing intensity, resting and others).
The species composition in grassland often changes when some species gain a competitive advantage as a result of selective grazing. Palatable species and individual tufts gradually lose vigour, at the expense of unpalatable species and
tufts, and eventually die.Over time, the grassland becomes dominated by the undesirable (or Increaser) species while the desirable species (or Decreasers) disappear.
Mesic grasslands recover slowly from disturbances that kill the grass tufts, while arid grasslands recover more easily by seeding. The effects of grazing and fire are difficult to separate as they have a close and subtle interaction. Mesic grasslands are generally adapted to, and indeed require, a combination of fire and grazing. The proportion of each will vary across the range of ecosystems from mesic to dry, but to exclude either will be detrimental. In general, the lower the grazing
pressure, the more fire is needed, especially in mesic and coastal grasslands.
Most grassland ecosystems lose some plant species under the sustained pressure typical of many commercial grazing regimes. But an appropriate grazing regime has several positive effects on biodiversity:
Grazing for biodiversity and sustainable productivity is possible using the following principles adapted to local ecosystems and management contexts:
Consider four key factors when developing a grazing plan:
The following part of this series will model a farm-scale rotation plan that can be adapted to a specific management and
This article was written on behalf of the SA National Biodiversity Institute (Sanbi) Grasslands Programme. Email Dr Richard Lechmere-Oertel at firstname.lastname@example.org. The electronic booklet Grazing and Burning for Grassland Biodiversity can be downloaded at www.grasslands.org.za.
Organised agricultural organisations have expressed serious concern that any further load-shedding carried out by Eskom during important production periods could…
The recent foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) outbreak in Limpopo, and the subsequent loss of South Africa's FMD-free status, has had a…
Professor Cyril Nhlanhla Mbatha of Unisa’s Graduate School of Business Leadership outlines some key production and marketing strategies to help…