The biggest story coming out of the recent Group of Seven (G7) summit in Canada is the heckling by US President Donald Trump on Twitter, which was directed at other member countries of the G7, and Canada in particular.
“Fair Trade is now to be called ‘fool trade’ if it is not reciprocal,” read Trump’s tweet.
He followed this with a second tweet that said: “Why should I, as President of the United States, allow countries to continue to make massive trade surpluses, as they have for decades, while our farmers, workers and taxpayers have such a big and unfair price to pay? Not fair to the people of America! [A] $800 billion trade deficit…”
While his social media tactics may be puerile, and farmers in the US have already expressed concern that they will be collateral damage in Trump’s trade war, I think we must acknowledge that an open debate on fairness in international trade is long overdue.
What really worries me is that if the strongest economic nation in the world cannot get a fair-trade deal, even from some of its closest allies, then what chance does a small global player like South Africa have of protecting its local industries from the effects of unfair trade?
Global indifference to multilateralism in international trade was clearly on display last year at the World Trade Organization’s ministerial meeting, which ended in discord after participants failed to reach any new agreements.
In South Africa, the growing intolerance with what are perceived to be prejudicial trade deals has found an outlet in civic movements that loudly and publicly oppose issues such as the dumping of cheap chicken and sugar onto the South African market.
However, it will be of little benefit to farmers if, as a knee-jerk reaction to what may be one unfair trade relationship, additional restrictions are put in place that ultimately further inhibit the free flow of agricultural products across borders.
After the G7 summit, the World Farmers’ Organisation (WFO) issued a statement calling on the governments of the G7 countries to reconsider their trade tactics in a manner that could foster food security, address climate change issues and grant the agriculture sector viability worldwide.
WFO added that the world should disrupt existing trade practices that harm markets for farmers and lead to food insecurity in food-importing countries, but added that farmers and consumers alike rely on stable international trade.
The theme for the conference, to be held at Emperors Palace in Johannesburg from 18 to 19 July, is ‘Partnerships for equitable trade’.
Panel discussions will focus on topics such as, ‘Who owns the value in the agricultural value chain?’ and ‘Towards a fairer, freer and friendlier trading environment’.
The agricultural journalism and farming communities are mourning the loss of Alita van der Walt, former editor of Farmer’s Weekly,…
South African cotton prices are still declining, despite the second largest cotton yield on record.
Wagyu beef is a “curve bender” in terms of fatty acid composition, and the breed has the ability to actually…
Byron Booysen started farming only five years ago and now produces tomatoes and other crops in an undercover system on…
Arthur Rudman, veteran game rancher and member of the Professional Hunters’ Association of South Africa and Wildlife Ranching South Africa,…
Paris’ flagship farming project is nearing completion, with the city preparing to become home to one of the world’s largest…